An international conference in Iceland and a current risk assessment of the mobile communications sector have raised eyebrows. No less impressive is the report by Frank Berner, board member of “Elektrosensible München”, on the “difficult reality of life” for EHS sufferers.
A conference in Reykjavik on February 24, 2017 set an example, according to a report by the Doctors and Mobile Communications Competence Initiative: The event, organized by the “Parents organization of preschool children”, advocates wired, i.e. WLAN-free, technology in educational institutions and schools. The conference resulted in an international appeal for wired technology in schools, which has since gained worldwide support.
“diagnose:funk” has translated the appeal as follows: “We, the undersigned, are concerned about the health and development of our children in schools where wireless technology is used in the classroom. A large number of scientific studies have shown significant medical risks from long-term exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices and networks, far below the recommended limits of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). We call on the responsible government authorities to live up to their responsibility for the well-being and future of our children …”
Risk assessments in the mobile communications sector
The
St. Gallen Risk Dialogue Foundation
produced a report on current risk assessments in the mobile communications sector on behalf of the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BFS). It was pleasing that non-governmental, civil society expertise was also included. International and national organizations were selected and evaluated which, according to the study, “have a relevant influence on the discussion and political debate on possible health effects of mobile phone radiation”. Objective: Transparent information for a wider public about divergent risk assessments.
The project was divided into three phases:
Phase 1: “Processing of theory and selection of existing documents”
Phase 2: “Preparation of the state of knowledge about the perception and processing of information for risk assessment
Phase 3: “Creation of a tabular comparison as an aid for risk communication”
50 organizations selected
For the project objective “comparative analysis and presentation of risk assessments and explanation of different assessments”, more than 50 organizations were identified that deal with the topic of EMF or “mobile radio risks” in Germany and/or the neighboring countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, so-called DACH countries) as well as internationally. The starting point of 50 organizations was deliberately chosen to prevent only large and well-known names from being included in the comparison.
How can it be that the statements differ so greatly?
The project has met with great interest from organizations that carry out risk assessments in the field of mobile radio. Above all, organizations critical of mobile radio welcome the willingness to engage in dialogue that the BfS is demonstrating with the study. The interested public is thus given the opportunity to find out more without much effort. A large number of questions can be answered with this information. Which organization says what about which potential risk topic? What do organizations say whose opinions I may not share? How can it be that the statements differ so greatly? …
Digitalization with side effects
Frank Berner, board member of “Elektrosensible München“, reports from the perspective of people with electrohypersensitivity (EHS) in the magazine “Die Wurzel” (1/2017). He writes about the “difficult, inhumane reality of life” for EHS sufferers and calls for social change.
From the article: “In addition to a generally recognizable sensitivity, electrohypersensitive people have become ill as a result of living in today’s environment. In other words, there is an overreaction that is incomprehensible to healthy people, even to seemingly small artificial electromagnetic fields … Overall, electro-hypersensitive people and their fate are not visible to the public. With the exception of a few self-help groups such as the Münchner Verein für Elektrosensible und Mobilfunkgeschädigte e.V., they neither have the strength nor are they able to make their own efforts for improvement … Unpolluted zones for living, recreation and detoxification are urgently needed. And if it is no longer possible to live in the traditional habitats without forced radiation, these new “white zones” must be created as ecological settlements with completely normal economic, social and cultural needs …”
Generate a harmonic oscillation field
How can you protect yourself from high-frequency radiation and electrosmog? “The law of resonance states that no resonances can occur in an oscillation field with oscillations whose frequencies lie outside those of the field,” says Richard Neubersch, owner of Swiss Harmony in Therwil (CH), a company specializing in the harmonization of electrosmog. In other words: In a harmonic oscillation field, artificial radiation has no effect, regardless of who generates it, whether it comes from a neighbor or a nearby mobile phone mast. The mobile products from Swiss Harmony (BioRing, BodyCard, BioBracelet and the BioPatch) harmonize the human body by transmitting the harmonic vibration as information to the human energy system. This means that artificially created radiation fields can no longer resonate.
Protection from harmful radiation
In concrete terms, this means Products from Swiss Harmony for harmonizing houses and apartments ensure that the electricity that supplies a building with electricity receives a different message. “They transfer the information of the visible light spectrum to the passing current via the resonance path, which in turn distributes it throughout the entire effective range of the circuit,” explains Richard Neubersch. The electromagnetic field of the apartment or house thus becomes a harmonious field. In-house WLAN transmitters, cell phones or cordless phones are interference-free because they are connected to the harmonic current field and therefore emit the same harmonic information.