5G between the population, science and a billion-dollar business

While some scientists, such as Professor James C. Lin, are using new findings to classify mobile phone radiation as clearly carcinogenic, others, such as the federal expert Professor Martin Röösli, are being strongly criticized by 22 cancer researchers from 13 countries for conflicts of interest.

Around 200 people took part in a protest rally against 5G in Bern on Saturday, as bluewin.ch reports. They fear that the new mobile phone network endangers people’s health and is harmful to the climate. The rally on Waisenhausplatz was part of an international day of protest, according to the “Protection from Radiation” association. The program included campaigns in 33 countries, as well as in Biel, Brienz and Thun in the canton of Bern. 5G means many additional, selectively stronger antennas and thus an increased burden on people, animals and the environment. Even below the legal limits, mobile radio is harmful to people’s health. However, 5G is also harmful to the climate because it will further increase electricity consumption. The demonstrators called for the introduction of the 5G network to be halted. The first step would be to examine how people could be better protected. These demands are countered by the interests of the (mobile communications) industry. Understandably, it has little interest in renouncing 5G or letting anyone look at its cards. Because the new 5G mobile communications standard will ensure good business. According to Hamburg-based Statista GmbH, global sales of 5G network technology are expected to amount to around 26 billion US dollars in 2022. In 2018, it still amounted to USD 528 million.

“Scientific misconduct”?

22 cancer researchers and biologists from 13 countries accuse the leading Swiss electrosmog expert, Prof. Martin Röösli, of “scientific misconduct” and “conflicts of interest”, as Christoph Pfluger writes in Zeitpunkt magazine. In a letter dated January 7 , the scientists ask President Simonetta Sommaruga to consider relieving Martin Röösli “of his duties as an objective federal expert on the health effects of radiofrequency radiation and electromagnetic fields”. When asked, Professor Martin Röösli emphasizes – according to Christoph Pfluger – that his research work is not funded by industry, but only by public funds or charitable organizations. Among the non-profit sources, he apparently includes the Research Foundation for Electricity and Mobile Communication (FSM), whose funds mainly come from industry. Switzerland. Tropen-Institut, Martin Röösli’s employer, is financially supported by Swisscom, according to the magazine Zeitpunkt. Röösli is convinced that the costs of mobile radio risk research should not be left to the public purse alone, but should be co-financed by the mobile radio industry. “But you can certainly imagine more transparent financing than a private foundation,” criticizes Christoph Pfluger. For example, the public sector could award research contracts to industry-independent institutes and charge the costs to the mobile communications industry. “This would ensure much more transparency than an industry-financed foundation that appoints its own board of trustees and management, even if the staff are nominally independent and do not come from industry.”

NTP study: “Cancer potential proven”

The environmental and consumer organization diagnose:funk has published the German translation of a specialist article by Professor James C. Lin (University of Illinois) on the subject of mobile phone radiation and cancer. Professor Lin works as a biophysicist and is a world-renowned expert. He was a member of the peer review panel for the NTP study. In his current article “The significance of primary tumors in the NTP study on long-term exposure of rats to mobile phone radiation”, Lin comments on the results of the NTP study and the Ramazzini study. Both studies investigated whether mobile phone radiation can cause cancer. In his article, Professor Lin calls for the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) to tighten the classification of the cancer potential of mobile phone radiation. Since 2011, cell phone radiation has been classified as “possibly carcinogenic”, and the classification as “probably carcinogenic” or even “carcinogenic” is now under discussion. Professor Lin writes in his current article on the NTP study: “It is time for the IARC to tighten its previous classification of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields with regard to their carcinogenicity for humans based on epidemiological results.” Because: “The NTP study proves the cancer potential of mobile phone radiation.”

No tests on the biological compatibility of 5G

As reported by the Bayerische Staatszeitung, Martin L. Pall criticizesProfessor emeritus of biochemistry and basic research in medicine at Washington State University in the USA: “The claims of the mobile phone industry that electromagnetic fields in the microwave range only affect the outer centimeters of the body are clearly false. It has been known for decades that the magnetic, non-thermal component can penetrate much deeper into the body than the electrical component. There are no tests on the biological compatibility of actual 5G radiation. There is therefore neither a risk analysis nor a risk management, because no risk assessment of 5G has yet been carried out,” writes the US scientist in his paper 5G as a serious global challenge. According to the report in the Bayerische Staatszeitung, all health damage observed in humans to date can be traced back to a common mechanism, namely the activation of voltage-dependent calcium channels in the human body. The calcium channels are opened and the inside of the cell is flooded with calcium ions. This would not only reduce the synthesis of steroid hormones (oestrogen, progesterone, testosterone), but also slow down detoxification processes and reduce vitamin D activity. By attacking all major bodily systems, the electromagnetic fields seem to jeopardize everything that is important, such as health, the reproductive system, the integrity of our genome and the ability to produce healthy offspring. In industrialized countries, birth rates are already below the level required to maintain the population. The sperm count had dropped by half the normal value.

Generate a harmonic oscillation field

How can you protect yourself and your children from high-frequency radiation and electrosmog? “The law of resonance states that no resonances can occur in an oscillation field with oscillations whose frequencies lie outside those of the field,” says Richard Neubersch, owner of Swiss Harmony in Grellingen, a company that specializes in the harmonization of electrosmog. In other words: In a harmonic oscillation field, artificial radiation has no effect, regardless of who generates it, whether it comes from a neighbor or a nearby mobile phone mast. The mobile products from Swiss Harmony (BioRing, BodyCard, BioBracelet and the BioPatch) harmonize the human body by transmitting the harmonic vibration as information to the human energy system. This means that artificially created radiation fields can no longer resonate.

Protection from harmful radiation

In concrete terms, this means Products from Swiss Harmony for harmonizing houses and apartments ensure that the electricity that supplies a building with electricity receives a different message. “They transfer the information of the visible light spectrum to the passing current via the resonance path, which in turn distributes it throughout the entire effective range of the circuit,” explains Richard Neubersch. The electromagnetic field of the apartment or house thus becomes a harmonious field. In-house WLAN transmitters, cell phones or cordless phones are interference-free because they are connected to the harmonic current field and therefore emit the same harmonic information.

Share post

• 5G
• Electrosmog
• Electrosmog pollution

---

Swiss Harmony