Having a say instead of suffering

People’s need to have a say in digital developments is growing. On the one hand, this is shown by the latest surveys, and on the other hand, this trend is confirmed by the numerous protests and resistance to the introduction of the controversial 5G mobile communications standard.

The population wants to have a say in the digital future, but hardly anyone wants to leave the field to the experts alone. This is shown by the DigitalBarometer 2019 from APROPOS_– an initiative of the Risk Dialogue Foundation. People have a differentiated view of digitalization. Depending on the subject area, such as the automation of work processes, e-voting or training, the focus is on opportunities, risks or both.

Protest against autonomous driving in Stuttgart

Just how serious people are about having a say and also about certain fears surrounding digitalization is shown, for example, by the protest of 170 citizens from Stuttgart, who adopted an appeal against the planned transmission systems for autonomous driving on 12 February. According to a report by diagnose-funk.org, the traffic lights in the districts of Weilimdorf, Bad Cannstatt, Hofen, Zuffenhausen, Wangen, Hedelfingen and Obertürkheim are to be equipped with WLAN transmitters with a range of 500 meters in order to control car-to-car communication. Naturefriends and visitors protested against this at an event in Forum 3, where media critic Andreas Neider, physician Dr. Jörg Schmid and Peter Hensinger from diagnose:funk gave presentations.

Major 5G resistance in French-speaking Switzerland

According to a survey, 60 percent of French-speaking Swiss are “against or rather against” the new mobile communications standard. Cantons react, churches ban antennas, a radio installation is blown up in Vaud. Who is behind the movement? The NZZ deals with this question in the article “Why the 5G resistance is particularly strong in French-speaking Switzerland”. Among other things, we find out what the resistance to 5G in French-speaking Switzerland has already achieved: The canton of Geneva, for example, has decided to place a moratorium on new mobile phone antennas. Parliament also wants a moratorium in the Jura. In Fribourg, new antennas now have to undergo a proper building permit procedure; two parishes refused to allow Salt and Sunrise antennas in their church towers, which made the headlines. The Vaud government has published a “Guide to resistance to mobile phone antennas”. For example, it states the following about planning permission for new masts: “During the appeal phase, it is not even necessary to live near the planned antenna.”

“Possibly carcinogenic”

Neither mobile phone opponents nor supporters can currently present meaningful long-term studies. Many renowned institutions – including the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection – have also pointed out this need for research. The frequently made statement that “radio equals radio” is also scientifically untenable and must not trivialize the potential health risks. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radio radiation as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) on the basis of the available studies. This classification is still current and applies to all radio frequencies, including the frequencies intended for 5G up to 300 GHz (note: 5G is within this described range: 0.7-0.8 GHz, 3.4 – 3.8 GHz and in the future 26 GHz and higher).

Highly significant tumor-promoting co-factor

Subsequent studies published on diagnose-funk.org have confirmed this assessment.

• https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/electromagnetic-fields-and-public-health-mobile-phones
• http://www.emfexplained.info/?ID=25731
• https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf

A recently widespread interpretation that “possibly carcinogenic” means “not probably or improbably carcinogenic” is wrong and can be seen as a deception for the ignorant and non-linguists. Even the much-cited and quite mobile-friendly expert Alexander Lerchl, Chairman of the Committee for Non-Ionizing Radiation of the Commission on Radiological Protection and Professor at Jacobs University in Bremen, has published a study with the result that mobile radio acts as a highly significant tumor-promoting co-factor: “Numbers of tumors of the lungs and livers in exposed animals were significantly higher than in sham-exposed controls.”

Generate a harmonic oscillation field

How can you protect yourself and your children from high-frequency radiation and electrosmog? “The law of resonance states that no resonances can occur in an oscillation field with oscillations whose frequencies lie outside those of the field,” says Richard Neubersch, owner of Swiss Harmony in Grellingen, a company that specializes in the harmonization of electrosmog. In other words: In a harmonic oscillation field, artificial radiation has no effect, regardless of who generates it, whether it comes from a neighbor or a nearby mobile phone mast. The mobile products from Swiss Harmony (BioRing, BodyCard, BioBracelet and the BioPatch) harmonize the human body by transmitting the harmonic vibration as information to the human energy system. This means that artificially created radiation fields can no longer resonate.

Protection from harmful radiation

In concrete terms, this means Products from Swiss Harmony for harmonizing houses and apartments ensure that the electricity that supplies a building with electricity receives a different message. “They transfer the information of the visible light spectrum to the passing current via the resonance path, which in turn distributes it throughout the entire effective range of the circuit,” explains Richard Neubersch. The electromagnetic field of the apartment or house thus becomes a harmonious field. In-house WLAN transmitters, cell phones or cordless phones are interference-free because they are connected to the harmonic current field and therefore emit the same harmonic information.

Share post

• 5G
• Electrosmog
• Electrosmog pollution

---

Swiss Harmony